10 · Workplan (Weeks 4–10)
Owner: Pallavi Dani (core chapter) · Editors: Steven Uggowitzer Effort: ~1.5 person-days · Due: v0.5 EOD Fri 2026-09-04 · v0.8 Fri 2026-09-11
What WHO expects here
A workplan that is not a wall of prose. A Gantt they can look at once and know when things happen. Named consultant per deliverable. Named gate dates. Brazzaville trip windows explicit so WHO country office can plan around them. Ties back to the risk register so a reviewer can see what happens if a date slips.
Ultimate contents
Gantt through Weeks 4–10
Rendered chart (Mermaid gantt or a Typst-native diagram) that a reviewer can absorb in ten seconds. Colour-coded by workstream. Includes the four contractual deliverables + the intermediate internal artefacts (iteration demos, weekly updates, steering committee meetings).
Named deliverables + gate dates
Table view of the same content: what ships, when, who owns, who approves, what happens if it slips.
| Deliverable | Gate date (hypothetical) | Author | Approver | Slip consequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Inception Report | Fri 2026-09-19 | Steven | Stephanie -> Droti | Every downstream date compresses |
| D2 Draft Review Report | Fri 2026-10-24 | Steven + Simon | Stephanie -> Droti | Validation-workshop rescheduling |
| D3 Final Review Report | Fri 2026-11-07 | Steven | Stephanie -> DPM | Contract-close date at risk |
| D4 Executive Presentation | Wk 10 (Brazzaville if T2 confirmed) | Steven + Stephanie | Stephanie | Verbal presentation delivered anyway |
Resource allocation per consultant
Per-week per-consultant load. Where two consultants share a workstream, who is primary vs supporting. Where a consultant is off, that is called out (Steven off between date X and date Y — surface any known off-time here).
Brazzaville trip windows
Trip 1 (bid manifest = Simon + Charles, plus Stephanie francophone-cover from Johannesburg) opens on ~Wk 4. Trip 2 (if confirmed) around Wk 9–10 for D4 delivery. Steven joins Trip 1 only if IQVIA elects and only from ~2026-09-07 onward.
Milestone ties to risk register
Each gate date is a risk-register anchor. If the gate is at amber or red, the risk register (Chapter 11) shows why and what the mitigation is.
Change-control mechanism
If a date needs to move, the change-control log (T25 in the master plan) captures the request, the reasoning, and the WHO/IQVIA joint agreement. Named in this chapter so the mechanism is visible up-front rather than surfacing during the first slip.
Evidence to draw on
workspace/plan/00_MASTER_PLAN.mdPart G (weekly execution schedule)- IQVIA Technical Approach §Gantt (bid slide 11)
workspace/repos/afro-docs/typst/assets/diagrams/for Gantt sources- Consultant availability confirmations (out-of-band)
Complementary effort triggered
Pallavi’s core chapter. Gantt maintained in a live tool + exported. Explicit gate dates. Team commitment on availability confirmed in writing.